Legislation Details

File #: 26-7873    Name: RESOLUTION NO. R2026-45 WELLINGTON VILLAGE (FKA K PARK) CONDITIONAL USE FOR BUILDING HEIGHT A RESOLUTION OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA’S COUNCIL, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE (PETITION 2026-0003-CU) FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS WELLINGTON VILLAGE MIXED USE PL
Type: Conditional Use
Body: Village Council
Agenda Date: 9/22/2026 Final action:
Title: RESOLUTION NO. R2026-45 WELLINGTON VILLAGE (FKA K PARK) CONDITIONAL USE FOR BUILDING HEIGHT A RESOLUTION OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA’S COUNCIL, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE (PETITION 2026-0003-CU) FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS WELLINGTON VILLAGE MIXED USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MUPD) (FKA K PARK), TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 71.27 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRIBLING WAY AND US441/SR7, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO AMEND THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR BUILDING D1 AND D2 (MIXED USE) OF POD B, APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. R2026-08 FROM 42 FEET TO 48 FEET; TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 37 FEET FOR BUILDING E1 AND 39 FEET (MIXED USE) FOR BUILDING E2 (MIXED USE) OF POD B; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Attachments: 1. 1. Resolution R2026-45 K Park Pod B Building Height02122026, 2. 2. Resolution R2026-45 Exhibit B - Renderings and Elevations, 3. 3. Resolution R2026-45 Exhibit C - Gray Wood Palm Height, 4. 4. Exhibit A - Proposed Site Plan, 5. 5. Exhibit B - Justification Statement, 6. 6. R2026-45 (KPARK CU) - Legal Ad Proof, 7. 7. Staff Report
Date Action ByActionResultVoteMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

…title

ITEM:                     RESOLUTION NO. R2026-45 WELLINGTON VILLAGE (FKA K PARK) CONDITIONAL USE FOR BUILDING HEIGHT

 

A RESOLUTION OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA’S COUNCIL, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE (PETITION 2026-0003-CU) FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS WELLINGTON VILLAGE MIXED USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MUPD) (FKA K PARK), TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 71.27 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRIBLING WAY AND US441/SR7, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO AMEND THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR BUILDING D1 AND D2 (MIXED USE) OF POD B, APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. R2026-08 FROM 42 FEET TO 48 FEET; TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 37 FEET FOR BUILDING E1 AND 39 FEET (MIXED USE) FOR BUILDING E2 (MIXED USE) OF POD B; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 

 

REQUEST:                     Approval of Resolution No. R2026-45 to amend the previously approved allowed height (Resolution No. R2026-08) for Buildings D1 and D2 from 42 feet to 48 feet and to allow a building height of 37 feet for Buildings E1 and 39 feet for Building E2 within Pod B of Wellington Village MUPD.

 

…body

EXPLANATION:                     The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use approval to amend the previously approved allowed height (Resolution No. R2026-08) for Buildings D1 and D2 from 42 feet to 48 feet and to allow a building height of 37 feet for Buildings E1 and 39 feet for Building E2 within Pod B of Wellington Village MUPD.

 

At the September 1, 2026 Architectural Review Board (ARB) meeting, the Board unanimously recommended approval (6-0) of the Conditional Use request.

 

This item will be heard at the September 16, 2026 Planning, Zoning, and Adjustment (PZAB) meeting. An update will be provided to Council with the results of that meeting.

 

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED:                     NO 

 

PUBLIC HEARING:                     YES                       QUASI-JUDICIAL:                     YES

 

FIRST READING:                     YES                      SECOND READING:   

 

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:                     YES

 

FISCAL IMPACT:                     N/A

 

WELLINGTON FUNDAMENTAL:                     Responsive Government

 

RECOMMENDATION:                     All required application documentation has been reviewed by the Development Review Manager and Wellington Departments to determine compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and LDR, subject to conditions provided in the staff report.

 

Findings of Fact have been provided in the Staff Report to recommend approval of the Conditional Use request. These findings are subject to other competent substantial evidence presented at the quasi-judicial public hearing.