Village of Wellington Logo
File #: 24-6820    Name: RESOLUTION NO. R2024-41 (ADOPTING NEW COUNCIL PROCEDURES) A RESOLUTION OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA’S COUNCIL REVISING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Type: Presentation
Body: Village Council
Agenda Date: 10/22/2024 Final action:
Title: ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. R2024-41 (ADOPTING NEW COUNCIL PROCEDURES) A RESOLUTION OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA'S COUNCIL REVISING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. REQUEST: Approval of Resolution No. R2024-41 adopting New Council Procedures.
Attachments: 1. 1. Resolution No. R2024-41 (New Council Procedures), 2. 2. DRAFT COUNCIL PROCEDURES (Changes Per Council Direction at 10.8 meeting -RL), 3. 3. DRAFT COUNCIL PROCEDURES (Changes Per Council Direction at 10.8 meeting - Clean
Date Action ByActionResultVoteMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
...title
ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. R2024-41 (ADOPTING NEW COUNCIL PROCEDURES)

A RESOLUTION OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA'S COUNCIL REVISING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

REQUEST: Approval of Resolution No. R2024-41 adopting New Council Procedures.
...body
EXPLANATION: Wellington's Council meetings are currently governed by the procedures adopted through Resolution No. R2011-75. In the 13 years since the passage of the resolution, there have been changes in the law that have required the Council to modify how it conducts its meetings. For example, in 2013, the Florida Legislature adopted section 286.0114, Florida Statutes, which governs public meetings, the adoption of procedures for public meetings, and the opportunity of the public to be heard during the decision-making process. Under the statute, members of the public must be able to be heard on matters prior to official action, including items on the consent agenda. In addition, recent court decisions have clarified that general prohibitions against personally directed and offensive remarks constitute viewpoint discrimination, see, e.g., Marshall v. Amuso, 571 F. Supp. 3d 412, 422 (E.D. Pa. 2021), which the U.S. Supreme Court has described as "an egregious form of content discrimination. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of Univ. of Va., 515 U.S. 819, 829 (1995).

Further, the quasi-judicial hearing procedures currently in place are vulnerable to being used by interested parties and members of the public in a manner not intended when the rules were adopted. The proposed procedures address those concerns as well as clarify other procedural matters to ensure a fair and efficient process.

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: NO

PUBLIC HEARING: NO QUASI-JUDICIAL:

FIRST READING: SECOND READING:

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: YES

FISCAL IMPACT: NONE

WELLINGTON FUNDAMENTAL: Responsive Government

RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution No. R2024-41 adopting New Council Proc...

Click here for full text